A Democratic bill to reverse the FCC’s repeal of net
neutrality rules now has enough Senate support to guarantee a vote. In a press
release, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) announced that she had become the 30th
cosponsor to the measure which would return the nation to the Obama-era
internet rules.
The bill, introduced by Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney (D-N.Y.),
would subject the FCC decision to a vote of disapproval under the Congressional
Review Act. Under the CRA, Congress has 60 legislative days to disapprove of
new regulations by a simple majority vote. If Congress does not vote to
disapprove, the regulations go into effect, but if Congress strikes down the
new rules the FCC would be barred from reissuing a rule that is substantially
the same. The president can veto a CRA disapproval vote by Congress.
The bill, HR
4585, currently lists 34 cosponsors in the House, all of them Democrats.
The 30
senators supporting the bill are also all Democrats.
With Republican majorities in both the Senate and the House,
the legislation seems doomed to failure, but the Democrat goal seems to be to
force Republicans into an unpopular vote in a tough election year. Since the
FCC vote in early December, Democrats and liberal activists have warned that
the new rules will mean the end of the internet. Amid the hysteria, FCC Chairman
Ajit Pai has received threats
that forced him to cancel an appearance at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las
Vegas.
“Republicans are faced with a choice,” said Sen. Edward
Markey (D-Mass.) in a press
release, “be on the right side of history and stand with the American
people who support a free and open internet, or hold hands with the special
interests who want to control the internet for their own profit.”
“Every member of the U.S. Senate will have to go on the
record, during a tight election year, and either vote to save the Internet or
rubber stamp its death warrant,” said Evan Greer, an internet activist quoted
in The
Hill.
It was Congress’ failure to address internet regulation that
provided an opening for the FCC
to introduce net neutrality rules as far back as 2005 and then more onerous
rules under President Obama in 2015. When the legislative branch failed to
enact a law establishing a national policy on internet regulation, the rules
became subject to the whims of successive administrations.
While few Republicans are likely to sign up to support the
Democrat bill to reestablish the Obama-era internet rules, some might be
persuaded to join a compromise bill that would enact permanent internet regulations.
Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) introduced a competing net neutrality bill last
month, the Open
Internet Preservation Act. Blackburn’s bill would prohibit throttling and
blocking traffic, but would also ban the FCC from regulating the internet as a
utility.
At this point, it is uncertain whether either bill can
garner enough support to become law. What is certain is that as long as
Congress fails to make internet policy, consumers and companies will be forced
to endure regulatory swings from the left to the right and back again.
Originally published
on The Resurgent
No comments:
Post a Comment