There is the sense of an impending train wreck between
President Trump and independent counsel Robert Mueller. You know it’s coming,
you know it’s going to be ugly, but you just can’t look away.
After rumors swirled a few weeks ago that President Trump
was considering firing Mueller, things quieted down. Over the last week, the
tension once again seems to be mounting with Trump’s criticism
of Attorney General Jeff Sessions for recusing himself from the Russia
investigation and the news that Mueller’s investigation is expanding to examine
Trump’s business dealings with Russians going back as far as 2008.
In response, the Trump Administration seems to be once again
considering the possibility of firing the special counsel, a move that many
Republicans argue would be destructive to the already-embattled Trump
Administration.
“Congress must make it very clear: Bye-bye Mueller, bye-bye
Trump. Otherwise bye-bye Congress 2018. Americans are fed up!” tweeted
Richard Painter, President George W. Bush’s ethics lawyer from 2005 to 2007.
Senator Marco Rubio (R-Fl.) agreed. “It would be a mistake
to fire Bob Mueller,” Rubio said in The
Hill.
The New
York Times reported that Team Trump is investigating the investigators with
an eye toward building a case for firing Mueller or simply discrediting his
probe. President Trump told the Times that he was aware that some of Mueller’s
investigators had conflicts of interest and that he would make this information
available “at some point.” Members of Mueller’s team have come under criticism
already for their contributions to Democrats.
There are also reports that the Trump Administration is
exploring the use of pardons to stymie the Mueller investigation. The Washington
Post reported that the president had asked legal advisors about his
presidential power to pardon aides and family members who might be snared by
Mueller’s net. The president even asked whether he could pardon himself.
“This is not in the context of, ‘I can’t wait to pardon
myself,’” said one unnamed advisor, who said that the president’s questions
were merely expressing curiosity about the extent of his constitutional powers.
President Trump has been fiercely protective of his privacy
as it relates to his business dealings and personal finances. During the
campaign, after initially promising to release his tax returns, he became the
first president in decades to keep his tax records private.
The Trump Administration has resisted the Russia
investigation every step of the way, with Trump denying for months that Russia
had even attempted to affect the election. The stonewalling has contributed to
continual drip of revelations about contacts between Trump campaign officials
and Russians. Although it isn’t clear if any laws were broken, the cover-up and
lack of cooperation and openness from the Trump Administration makes it seem as
if the president has something to hide.
The Administration’s efforts to keep its connections with
Russia concealed and Mueller’s directive to bring them into the open set the
stage for a confrontation between the two. If Trump is set on preserving his
privacy and protecting members of his staff from possible prosecution, then sooner
or later he will have to take action against Mueller. The resulting kerfuffle
is likely to make the firing of James Comey seem tame by comparison.
Read the full story on
The Resurgent
No comments:
Post a Comment